Interact with your tools
A “read-only” integration is a fancy clipboard. It can tell you the support queue is backing up or that a pull request has been sitting for three days, and then it leaves the actual work to you. You still open the tab, find the thread, write the reply, paste the link. The summary was never the hard part.
Skynet closes that gap. Once a tool is connected, Skynet can act inside it — reply in the Slack thread, open or comment on the GitHub PR, update the Notion page, file the issue. The same request can move through several tools at once, because Skynet already holds the memory and context from your sources. It knows which thread, which repo, which page.
Reading is table stakes. Acting is the point.
Here is the difference in practice. Ask a typical bot “what’s blocking the release?” and you get a list. Ask Skynet, and it can read the failing checks on the PR, post a comment tagging the right reviewer, drop a note in the engineering Slack channel, and tick the box on the launch page in Notion — in one pass, from one request.
A few of the things “take action” actually means:
- Slack — reply in a thread, post to a channel, react, share a file.
- GitHub — open a PR, leave a review comment, label an issue, close a stale one.
- Notion — create or update a page, fill a database row, check off a task.
- Plus more — and the list keeps growing as connectors land.
Connect once, then put it to work
Connect the tool
In Integrations, pick the tool and sign in through its own login. Skynet never asks for your password — you authorize it the same way you’d authorize any app, through the provider. Connect as many as you like.
Grant scoped permissions
You choose what Skynet can touch. Give it one repo or every repo, one Slack channel or the whole workspace, read-only or read-and-write. Scopes are set per tool, so connecting GitHub says nothing about what Skynet can do in Notion. Tighten or revoke them whenever you want.
Ask Skynet to do the work
Now describe the outcome, not the steps. Skynet figures out which tools to use and in what order, chaining them together across the single request.
Approve the actions that change things
Anything that writes to the outside world can pause for your sign-off. Skynet shows you exactly what it’s about to do — the comment text, the channel, the page — and waits. Approve it, edit it, or wave through the routine stuff so you only see the calls worth your attention.
That last step is the whole design. Reading is harmless, so it flows. Writing has consequences, so by default it asks. You stay the one who decides what actually ships, while Skynet handles the clicking, finding, and pasting that used to eat your afternoon.
Frequently asked questions
Slack, GitHub, and Notion today, with more connectors landing regularly. Each one supports real actions — not just reading — like replying, commenting, and updating pages.
Only if you let it. By default, anything that changes an external tool pauses for your approval and shows you what it will do. You can pre-approve low-stakes actions so routine work runs unattended.
Per tool, and as narrow as you want. Grant one repo or all of them, one channel or the workspace, read-only or read-and-write. What you allow in one tool never carries over to another, and you can revoke any scope at any time.
No. Skynet uses your access to act in each tool on your behalf; it does not hand one tool your data from another. It draws on your unified context to know what to do, but every action stays inside the tool and scope you authorized.